AG Lynch and the DOJ refuses to prosecute Palo Alto Police Officer April Wagner for making a false statement under federal penalty of perjury law, Title 18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury, her pointing her hand gun/fire arm at a citizen during a police stop. See evidence here: http://chiefburns.weebly.com/wagner.html
AG Lynch's refusal to prosecute Burns, Wagner and the others reveals that the “Rule of Law” does not exist and that the DOJ can arbitrarily apply the law whenever they want thereby elevating themselves to the status of dictator.
I've informed AG Lynch how to reveal the truth in my case, but she doesn't want to.
I've informed AG Lynch how she could obtain the original, unadulterated videos but she doesn't want to.
Even without the original videos and taser gun activation data there is still more than enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Chief Burns and several of his subordinate officers violated numerous federal laws which are still active pursuant to the 5 year statute of limitations.
I can only assume that Lynch has been deceived by the falsehoods fed to her by Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns in order to generate hatred of me by the use of his lies.
Since I do not have the original unadulterated videos I am forced to use an analogy in order to convey the magnitude and degree to which Chief Burns and his fellow officers edited and falsified the MAV video.
I've informed AG Lynch how she could obtain the original, unadulterated videos but she doesn't want to.
Even without the original videos and taser gun activation data there is still more than enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Chief Burns and several of his subordinate officers violated numerous federal laws which are still active pursuant to the 5 year statute of limitations.
I can only assume that Lynch has been deceived by the falsehoods fed to her by Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns in order to generate hatred of me by the use of his lies.
Since I do not have the original unadulterated videos I am forced to use an analogy in order to convey the magnitude and degree to which Chief Burns and his fellow officers edited and falsified the MAV video.
The photo on the left is of photo of two former Chicago Police Officers, Jerome Finnigan, left, and Timothy McDermott, hovering over their quarry, a drug suspect:
http://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/7/71/587596/judge-wont-seal-photo-cpd-cops-posing-african-american-man-antlers
http://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/7/71/587596/judge-wont-seal-photo-cpd-cops-posing-african-american-man-antlers
Imagine for a moment that the two captions above are from a video created by the Palo Alto Police that captured my encounter with them.
The video on the left represents what actually happened during the incident.
The video on the right is what Chief Dennis Burns and his fellow officers gave to the District Attorney in order to cover up Ofc. Kelly Burger's and Ofc. Manuel Temores' crimes while simultaneously incriminating me of a crime I did not commit.
That is the degree, the magnitude and scope of editing that took place as I informed former U.S. Attorney Michael Gennaco less then two weeks after viewing the video for the first time a month and a half-after the incident occurred.
The video on the left represents what actually happened during the incident.
The video on the right is what Chief Dennis Burns and his fellow officers gave to the District Attorney in order to cover up Ofc. Kelly Burger's and Ofc. Manuel Temores' crimes while simultaneously incriminating me of a crime I did not commit.
That is the degree, the magnitude and scope of editing that took place as I informed former U.S. Attorney Michael Gennaco less then two weeks after viewing the video for the first time a month and a half-after the incident occurred.
Below you will find a plethora of evidence that empirically proves my allegations beyond a reasonable doubt. I provide this evidence not to overly burden the reader regarding my message but to back up my allegations with the facts to any and all who would challenge my position and evidence.
There are two significant gaps in time and video footage in both taser videos so the Santa Clara County Crime added black filler to the videos in an attempt to get them to match up to cover up the editing and falsifying of the videos and taser gun activation data but they still proved that 4 seconds of audio video footage is missing from Officer Manuel Temores' taser video and MAV video. The Crime lab also proved that the video frames are not in chronological order. Yet with all this evidence to the contrary, the District Attorney said that no tampering occurred. (Keep in mind that there isn't only 4 seconds missing, actually approximately 25 to 30 seconds of audio/video footage has been removed from each recording.)
This also proves that the MAV videos are missing audio/video footage since the EDITED taser video matches up perfectly to the MAV videos.
Officer Kelly Burger verified with the medics at the scene of the incident that 4 taser probes were discharged
from 2 separate taser gun firings.
The video footage of the second taser gun firing is missing from the videos as well as the taser gun activation data empirically proving that a large amount, approximately 25 seconds, of video footage has been removed from Officer Manuel Temores' MAV video and then had been spliced back together.
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-5.html
I have asked that the Palo Alto Police and DOJ to provide the MAV scenes that correspond to the scenes above but they refuse to do so.
Perhaps the reason why AG Lynch does not want to prosecute the Palo Alto Police is because if she does she will be forced to prosecute
Taser International as well for conspiring with the Palo Alto Police.
Taser International as well for conspiring with the Palo Alto Police.
- Taser International Representative Andrew Hinz initially stated to federal that the two taser cameras that recorded the incident were sent to Taser International and destroyed;
- Taser International Representative Andrew Hinz falsely stated to federal court that the Palo Alto Police did not have a specific taser camera in their possession when in fact they did;
- Taser International Representative Andrew Hinz falsely stated to federal court that no electricity was transmitted through Ofc. Burger's taser wires for Burger himself stated at the scene as well as in court testimony that electricity was being transmitted through his taser wires;
The Department of Justice has been unable to refute the following evidence for over two years and
AG Lynch as had 5 months to refute evidence below but she cannot.
AG Lynch as had 5 months to refute evidence below but she cannot.
- hat an independent forensic expert, Gregg Stutchman verified that two taser videos have been edited, altered by having content removed;
- that the Santa Clara Crime Lab verified that a taser video is missing at least 4 seconds of video footage and both taser videos are not in chronological order;
- that two of the officers at the scene have acknowledge through their statements and court testimony that video footage is missing from Temores' MAV video;
- that three scenes of video footage have been removed from Officer Temores' MAV recording and that the Santa Clara DA has covered this up;
- that dialog has been removed from Officer Burger's MAV recording and Burger's Taser recording;
- that Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns made numerous false statements regarding the circumstances and evidence surrounding this incident;
- that Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns violated his own department policy by destroying the taser probes; by taking into personal possession the taser guns and taser cameras for over ten days and of refusing to provide the taser gun activation data during the criminal case;
- that Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns and his attorney submitted falsified taser gun activation data to federal court in 2011;
- that the taser gun "Data Ports", (activation data memory devices) have been tampered with verified because numerous activation recordings have been removed from the devices which is supposed to be impossible to do;
- that the taser gun "Data Ports", (activation data memory devices) have been tampered with verified because the Data Ports record and store all activations chronological order and the activations on the two taser guns are not in chronological order;
- that Officers Kelly Burger and Manuel Temores made false and penurious during the court hearings;
- that the Santa Clara County District Attorney knowingly used this false evidence in order to obtain a conviction;
- that all of this false evidence was submitted to the federal courts in February 2011 in order to mislead the courts, obstruct and pervert justice.
Fact: Ofc. Burger verified with the medics at the scene that there were two separate taser gun firings in which a total of four taser probes were discharged, 2 probes from each firing.
Fact: Chief Burns and his subordinates knowingly and deliberately destroyed the taser probes, taser cartridge, taser wires and AFIDS from the second taser gun firing in violation of their own department's policy.
Fact: The audio/video footage of the second taser gun firing is missing from both the taser video and the professionally edited MAV video.
29 factual pieces of evidence that proves this allegation and revealing a steady stream of criminal acts:
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-5.html
Similarities to shooting in South Carolina:
In Palo Alto California Ofc. Kelly Burger directs Ofc. Manuel Temores to remove evidence from the crime scene.
The officers fabricated the crime scene by removing evidence and then photographing the crime scene without the evidence in order to incriminate a citizen of a crime, a violation of PC 141b.
Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns lies when he states that officers throw property, evidence, away for Property Procedure 610.2 (a) requires that all evidence be secured into the property system/room.
Chief Burns:
Why did you take into your personal possession Ofc. Temores' and Ofc. Burger's taser guns and taser cameras in violation of department policy?
Why did you not secure the tamper proof MAV hard drives into evidence in violation of department policy?
Why did you purge the MAV hard drives of the original MAV videos in violation of department policy?
Why did you take into your personal possession Ofc. Temores' and Ofc. Burger's taser guns and taser cameras in violation of department policy?
Why did you not secure the tamper proof MAV hard drives into evidence in violation of department policy?
Why did you purge the MAV hard drives of the original MAV videos in violation of department policy?
1) HOW THE Palo Alto Police DID IT:
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/
2) How the DA Covered It Up:
http://jeffrosenda.weebly.com/da-cover-up.html
3) HOW TASER INTERNATIONAL DID IT:
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-7.html
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-6.html
4) HOW THE DOJ COVERED IT UP:
Former U.S. Attorney and Michael Gennaco's co-worker judge Lucy Koh violated Federal Rules of Procedure by suppressing evidence; changed officer testimony and made numerous false statements in order to conceal the crimes committed by the PAPD. Koh commandeered the case from Judge Jeremy Fogel in violation of Judicial ethics.
http://judgelucykoh.weebly.com/
http://judgelucykoh.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/5/2/3852497/refusal_to_recusal.pdf
6) Former U.S. Attorney Michael Gennaco who is the Palo Alto Police Auditor concealed every unethical and illegal act committed by the Palo Alto Police from the moment the PAPD. Koh and Gennaco worked out of the same office in the DOJ together
http://gennacobarcomplaint.weebly.com/
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/
2) How the DA Covered It Up:
http://jeffrosenda.weebly.com/da-cover-up.html
3) HOW TASER INTERNATIONAL DID IT:
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-7.html
http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-6.html
4) HOW THE DOJ COVERED IT UP:
Former U.S. Attorney and Michael Gennaco's co-worker judge Lucy Koh violated Federal Rules of Procedure by suppressing evidence; changed officer testimony and made numerous false statements in order to conceal the crimes committed by the PAPD. Koh commandeered the case from Judge Jeremy Fogel in violation of Judicial ethics.
http://judgelucykoh.weebly.com/
http://judgelucykoh.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/5/2/3852497/refusal_to_recusal.pdf
6) Former U.S. Attorney Michael Gennaco who is the Palo Alto Police Auditor concealed every unethical and illegal act committed by the Palo Alto Police from the moment the PAPD. Koh and Gennaco worked out of the same office in the DOJ together
http://gennacobarcomplaint.weebly.com/
Chief Burns and several of his officers have violated:
Title 18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury generally
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
The 5 year statute of limitations are still in effect:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3282
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31253.pdf
Title 18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury generally
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
The 5 year statute of limitations are still in effect:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3282
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31253.pdf