Just like the Tyler Harney case the City of Palo and the Palo Alto Police settles another excessive use of force law suit before the Plaintiff, in this case Tajae Murray could obtain the evidence as to why there is no recording of the Dog Jumping Out of the Patrol Car. If there was video than this aspect of the lawsuit would not be in dispute as it is. The question is, why is there no video?: https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/systemic-flaws.html
City Attorney Molly Stump summed up the reason for the settlement, "it serves the interest of the city."
Ya, $230,000 above the loss to Murray to ensure that tampering of the evidence is not revealed if it occurred. City sweeps another one under the rug with the consent of the public. https://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/murray-dog-bite.html |
Teen who allegedly did not resist or run is attacked by Palo Alto Police Dog.
Will the videos show what happened?
Will the videos show what happened?
Although we cannot say for certain at this time as the Police Auditor, Michael Gennaco has not provided the complete report, but it appears that based upon the initial cursory report the video of the Murray incident is missing.
Interestingly there is an application on the patrol car video systems which allows for the retrieval of video footage even when an officer forgets to turn the camera on.
It's called "Record After the Fact"
http://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/systemic-flaws.html
http://watchguardvideo.com/software/record-after-the-fact
So if this feature has been turned on there should be video footage even though the officer did not turn on the camera system.
The question is will Michael Gennaco address this issue in the completed report?
If not why not?
It's called "Record After the Fact"
http://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/systemic-flaws.html
http://watchguardvideo.com/software/record-after-the-fact
So if this feature has been turned on there should be video footage even though the officer did not turn on the camera system.
The question is will Michael Gennaco address this issue in the completed report?
If not why not?